This paper examines several ancient sources for instances in which figures exhibit disconnection, aversion, or repulsion towards the erotic sphere that is so valued in societies. The paper will mainly focus on two myths: those of Narcissus (as illustrated in Ovid’s Metamorphoses) and Hippolytus (as shown in Euripides’s Hippolytus, Seneca’s Phaedra, Ovid’s Metamorphoses, and Ovid’s Heroides). In this essay, I argue that these figures can be read as asexual and that their untimely ends were brought about by their refusal to conform to the societal expectations placed on men–often characterized by vigorous sexual appetite, which would eventually lead to a man passing down his bloodline and fulfilling his duty to his oikos. Since myth often reflects real life, and works as a tool people can use to think about themselves, it can be argued that the inclusion of asexual-coded figures supports the contention that the asexual identity has always existed, even if the words to describe it are a more recent development.Therefore, the Narcissus and Hippolytus episodes are valuable pieces of evidence for both ancient and modern discourses of sexuality stepping outside the bounds of allonormativity. From a methodical standpoint, I first analyze the ancient texts, including secondary sources on them, then look at studies and papers on modern-day asexuality and examine the myths through this lens.