In recent decades, partisanship between the Democratic and Republican parties in the US has grown, resulting in congressional gridlock and economic stagnation. Untangling the relationship between partisanship and major economic factors such as household income, homeownership, population, and poverty has the potential to solve these problems. Our hypothesis is that a state’s political leaning is not associated with these factors. Our data contained the political leaning of all 50 states and DC in the 2008 presidential election, alongside 71 economic variables in the aforementioned four categories of annual household income (1984-2018), home ownerships (1986-2014), population (2000-2005), and poverty rate (1990, 2000). We used principal component analysis (PCA) to condense the 71 dimensions into two dimensions for visualization, principal components (PCs) 1 and 2. They explained 48% and 13% of total variance. In the plot between the two PCs, dots represent states (and DC) colored by political leaning. The visualization revealed that a state’s political leaning is strongly tied to the 4 economic categories. Thus, we rejected our hypothesis. Political party and economic status are related, but determining how they are related is a limitation of our research. Further work must be done to determine whether it is political leaning that determines economic status or economic status that determines political leaning, or both. Unraveling the relationship between politics and economics can provide insights into the symptoms, causes, and possible solutions to the US’s growing polarization.
Keywords: partisanship, household income, homeownership, poverty, population, education