Throughout history, human-induced habitat loss, pollution, and hunting have pressured mammals to adapt to lifestyles that limit human interaction. When humans threaten wildlife, a fitness advantage is provided to animals who avoid human interaction. But what about in protected regions where these threats are limited? Cocha Cashu Biological Station, located in Manu National Park, is an example of one of these regions. While native communities continue to hunt within the research station, overall levels of hunting, deforestation, and pollution, are significantly lower than in the surrounding unprotected areas. Our research team chose to design a study in Cocha Cashu to analyze terrestrial mammal distribution in relation to human habitation in areas where human threats have historically been limited. Our hypothesis was that mammal abundance would increase with distance from human habitation. Our study design involved a northern and eastern transect with a near (N), medium-distanced (M), and far (F) trap location. Each trap location had both a sand and camera trap, and data was collected from the traps morning and night for four consecutive days. On the eastern transect, there was a positive linear relationship between distance from human habitation and number of mammals observed (N: 2 mammals, M: 4 mammals, F: 8 mammals). On the northern route, the highest number of mammals was observed at the medium-distanced location (N: 1 mammal, M: 7 mammals, F: 3 mammals). Overall, our data did not support our hypothesis that mammal abundance increases with distance from human habitation in protected areas. Our results do, however, provide a platform for further research on resource accessibility and its potentially larger influence on mammal distribution patterns than the influence of human habitation.