This is an analysis of The Roses of Heliogabalus (1888), by Dutch artist Lawrence Alma Tadema. Alma Tadema was an English classicist, creating art in the Victorian era, who participated heavily in the aesthetic movement of the Pre-Raphaelites. Alma Tadema was very successful in his time, mainly due to his use of color, photorealism, and meticulous attention to detail, which are all aspects that are very present, and generally praised, in The Roses of Heliogabalus. He is known for painting classic scenes, mainly of middle-class women, performing everyday activities. However, The Roses of Heliogabalus departs from this usual rendering, instead focusing on a tyrannical historical event, where a young Roman emperor, Heliogabalus, drowns his dinner guests in an avalanche of rose petals, suffocating, and in turn, murdering them. Many recent critics have denounced this work for being antiquarian; a common critique of this specific piece is that the figures in the scene lack morality in their expressions. However, I think morality is the very thing that can be found in this creation by Alma Tadema. It was common for Victorian art to be created with the thought of moralizing in mind. Alma Tadema, though often depicted as a shallow man who valued schoolboy humor, could not have gone through this era without picking up on the themes of the time. Through visual analysis, comparison to Alma Tadema’s peers, and an analysis of the time period and current events, I bring clarity to the themes of morality present in The Roses of Heliogabalus, and show that this piece, created by a man who was once dubbed “the worst painter of the 19th century,” is more valuable than recent critiques that it is only a shallow, antiquarian artwork.