Team leaders occasionally find themselves managing teams that have a member set on under-performing in the social group, or "social loafing." Many team leaders have difficulty managing this social loafer effectively. In our research, we focus on helping leaders identify social loafers on their team. Our goal is to create guidelines and strategies on how to work with social loafers after they have been identified. We use communication transcripts and performance data, gathered by social behavioral researchers, that conducted a hidden profile experimental simulation with rotating leadership and hidden social loafers amongst project members. This was done over time, as project requirements escalated. By applying recurrence quantification analysis, we gathered metrics on the development of communication patterns across time in terms of: being recurrent, deterministic, and chaotic. Statistical modeling was used with the intention of revealing the types of relationships between the ability to identify social loafers and project success. By providing a way to quantify the properties of dynamic systems, recurrence analysis offers group researchers a new approach for empirically studying group dynamics. Rather than presuming that such systems are linear, researchers can use recurrence analysis to assess the degree to which a system is stable, predictable, and complex. This work will provide value to researchers in demonstrating the application of the recurrence analysis method, and will help team leaders by exemplifying how they can manage tough situations where social loafers exist on a team.