The English language Wikipedia is notable for its large number of articles. The development of this online encyclopedia would not be possible without the intricate interactions of editors that help sustain the virtual collaborative platform. Editors have a role in creating and reshaping articles and therefore have a role in how Wikipedia evolves over time. Our study replicates a qualitative coding scheme created over 12 years ago that demonstrates that policy and power play a role in mass collaboration. The prior work shows that user interactions including collaboration, conflict, coercion, and consensus have influenced changes on Wikipedia articles. A team of researchers are currently working to replicate this qualitative coding scheme on English Wikipedia talk pages to understand how these different types of user interactions occur in current editor discussions around article construction. Our findings will help contribute to a deeper understanding of how power plays between users have changed since the initial study. Our preliminary results, show that editor debates often lead to questions around article scope and legitimacy of sources. Furthermore, while policies play a large role in article building, editors own opinions influence how editing occurs.