Abundance estimates are integral to wildlife management. In many cases however, abundance estimates are difficult to obtain due to excessive labor and costs. Alternatively, abundance indices can provide representative measurements of relative abundance. Furthermore, cameras are a convenient tool to obtain estimates of relative abundance using capture frequencies as indices, though are predominantly used on larger animals. Small mammal abundance is commonly used to measure for forest health, diversity, and prey availability, though is generally dependent on the use of live trapping. Broadening the application of camera traps can prove to develop better indices for abundance analyses. Through this study, we examine different indices of small mammal abundance to determine whether camera trap data can be used as an index of small mammal abundance. Using data collected from the field, an abundance estimate based on live trapping of mice, voles, and chipmunks is compared to our camera trap estimates of these three species. We tested three possible small mammal indices, two of which were camera based: proportion of cameras detecting a species, number independent detection events, and number of animals live captured on the first night. Each of the three indices that were tested gave an estimate of abundance which we compared with the live-capture density estimate to determine relative accuracy. The proportion detected estimate and the first night capture estimate were significantly correlated to the estimated population abundance of each species. The low population of voles influenced the results and are discussed further. This data may contribute meaningful data for future wildlife abundance analyses. By gaining an understanding of reliable indices, we are able to make better considerations for wildlife management decisions.