Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease that currently affects over 5 million Americans. We have previously demonstrated genetic and neuropathology-based variation across cognitively-defined AD subgroups. Here we sought to determine whether patterns of vascular risk factors differed across cognitively defined subgroups. We used data from the Seattle-based Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) prospective cohort study of individuals age 65+ and dementia-free at enrollment. ACT follows people at 2-year intervals to identify incident dementia and AD. We used cognitive data at the time of AD diagnosis to determine scores for memory, visuospatial abilities, language, and executive functioning. We used these scores to determine each individual’s average cognition and then domain-specific deficits below that individual average. We used these data to define six groups: no prominent domain, memory-, visuospatial-, language-, or executive functioning-prominent. We evaluated risk factors for these six groups from self-reported medical conditions including diabetes, stroke, and hypertension, and diagnosed atrial fibrillation or coronary artery disease. We used multinomial logistic regression models with the no prominent domain group as the reference. To account for multiple comparisons, we present tests of the null that each risk factor is unrelated to each subgroup, and an omnibus test of the association between each risk factor and any subgroup. Of 825 cases, nearly half had no prominent domain, a few had multiple prominent domains, and a single domain was prominent for the remainder. Memory-prominent domain was more common in people with diabetes and executive functioning-prominent was less common, although the omnibus test did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08). Despite low statistical power due to small group sizes, our results suggest possible differences in risk associated with diabetes. Subsequent work will refine these investigations using medications and evaluating glucose levels over time. These results support additional efforts to further understand cognitively-defined AD subgroups