As a result of rapid urbanization, Lake City, a neighborhood in north Seattle, has experienced a significant shift in its demographics, local socio-political dynamics, cultural values, economic conditions, and spatial boundaries. As an effort to better represent and improve the Lake City area, residents created the Lake City Neighborhood Alliance (LCNA), a network of 28 neighborhood organizations, including multiple neighborhood associations, a parent teacher association, a food bank, and a safe-street advocacy program, among others. Such alliances are often championed by neighborhood planning advocates as an effective way to increase citizen participation, enhance community representation, and improve neighborhood conditions. However, very few studies have looked closely at the challenges and internal dynamics of such alliances. This research fills that gap by understanding the benefits and difficulties that come with a parent organization, such as the LCNA, working to improve a community through collaboration between member organizations. Through a series of in depth interviews with LCNA members and participant observations, this project uses the LCNA as a case study to explore why organizations and their representatives continue to be a part of such coalitions, and how the structure of a neighborhood alliance can influence its ability to effectively address local problems and strengthen the community overall.