Women make up only 25% of employees in the technology industry (e.g., computer science careers, information technology, etc.). One possible explanation for this disparity is that hiring decisions are made based off cultural fit, or the perception of similarities between employers and job candidates. The current research investigates whether perceptions of cultural fit are determined in part by the design of workplace environments, and, as a result, whether stereotypical computer science (CS) environments might influence hiring decisions and contribute to the gender disparities in the technology industry. In our study, undergraduates were asked to imagine that they were hiring a job candidate for a technology company. Participants read a description of either a non-stereotypical (e.g., art posters on the wall, etc.) or stereotypical (e.g., Star Trek posters, computer parts, science fiction posters, etc.) CS workplace, and then read the resume of either a male or female job candidate. Participants then answered questions measuring perceived candidate fit into the company environment and hiring intention. We predict that participants who viewed the non-stereotypical CS workplace environment will be more likely to hire the female job candidate than participants who viewed the stereotypical environment. This work would suggest that the design of company environments can prevent non-traditional candidates from being hired, and that encouraging companies to create inclusive, non-stereotypical environments may reduce gender disparities in the technology industry.

Despite a narrowing performance gap between women and men in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) in the U.S., women continue to be less likely to pursue degrees or careers in these fields. One potential explanation for this enduring gap may be tied to gender roles, or beliefs about the proper way women and men should behave. Women and men who violate these gender roles are often considered deviants and encounter social backlash. We proposed that women who choose careers in STEM are perceived to deviate from gender norms more than those who simply do well in STEM fields. In the current study, female and male students rated how typical and desirable it is for women to perform well in math and to choose a math-related career. Similar questions were asked about English, a contrasting field not dominated by men. We predicted participants would believe that it is less desirable and less typical for women to choose math-related careers than for women to perform well in math. We did not expect this pattern to appear for English-related career choice and performance in English. Interventions designed to increase women’s participation in STEM fields, therefore, may need to shift from addressing performance to addressing pressures imposed upon women to forsake STEM careers.

America welcomes people from all over the world, enriching the country with a diverse range of cuisines. Unfortunately, Americans also have some of the highest rates of obesity in the world. We are interested in whether this diversity in cuisines might be contributing to the obesity epidemic. Specifically, our study examined whether having diverse options of ethnic cuisines influences people’s decisions to eat out. We hypothesized that people will be more likely to eat out if they were given diverse options of ethnic cuisines. Psychology students (N = 330) were asked to imagine they were moving to a new city and viewed a map that either had a diverse option of ethnic cuisines (2 Mexican, 2 Italian, 2 Chinese, and 2 American), only Chinese food, or only American food. Participants then indicated the number of times they would eat out in a week and how much they wanted to try all of the restaurants. Participants who were given diverse options of ethnic cuisines were more likely to report they would eat out and want to try all of the restaurants than participants who were given a limited option of ethnic cuisines. Thus, the results from this study support our hypothesis that having diverse cuisine options causes people to eat out more. Future research should examine whether diverse options lead to weight gain because of this greater desire to eat out.

While it is acknowledged that individuals of intersecting marginalized identities experience compounded prejudices, most of the research on intersecting identities has focused on the intersections of gender and race. In two studies, we seek to explore the intersection of weight and race on perceptions of American identity. This study builds on previous research findings that Asian Americans are perceived as less American than people of any other racial group. Furthermore, because Americans are stereotyped as overweight, we hypothesized that heavier Asian Americans would be perceived as more American and less likely to be in the US illegally than their thinner counterparts. Photos of Asian American and White American men were edited to create heavier and thinner versions of each man. University of Washington students viewed either a heavier or thinner version of one of the men and assessed his American identity and perceived documentation status. The heavier Asian American men were perceived as more American and less likely to be in the US without documentation than thinner versions of the same men. Weight did not influence perceptions of White men’s American identity or documentation status. These studies demonstrate that Asian Americans who gain weight may surprisingly be buffered from prejudice directed at those who are perceived as less American.