Despite a narrowing performance gap between women and men in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) in the U.S., women continue to be less likely to pursue degrees or careers in these fields. One potential explanation for this enduring gap may be tied to gender roles, or beliefs about the proper way women and men should behave. Women and men who violate these gender roles are often considered deviants and encounter social backlash. We proposed that women who choose careers in STEM are perceived to deviate from gender norms more than those who simply do well in STEM fields. In the current study, female and male students rated how typical and desirable it is for women to perform well in math and to choose a math-related career. Similar questions were asked about English, a contrasting field not dominated by men. We predicted participants would believe that it is less desirable and less typical for women to choose math-related careers than for women to perform well in math. We did not expect this pattern to appear for English-related career choice and performance in English. Interventions designed to increase women’s participation in STEM fields, therefore, may need to shift from addressing performance to addressing pressures imposed upon women to forsake STEM careers.

Women make up only 25% of employees in the technology industry (e.g., computer science careers, information technology, etc.). One possible explanation for this disparity is that hiring decisions are made based off cultural fit, or the perception of similarities between employers and job candidates. The current research investigates whether perceptions of cultural fit are determined in part by the design of workplace environments, and, as a result, whether stereotypical computer science (CS) environments might influence hiring decisions and contribute to the gender disparities in the technology industry. In our study, undergraduates were asked to imagine that they were hiring a job candidate for a technology company. Participants read a description of either a non-stereotypical (e.g., art posters on the wall, etc.) or stereotypical (e.g., Star Trek posters, computer parts, science fiction posters, etc.) CS workplace, and then read the resume of either a male or female job candidate. Participants then answered questions measuring perceived candidate fit into the company environment and hiring intention. We predict that participants who viewed the non-stereotypical CS workplace environment will be more likely to hire the female job candidate than participants who viewed the stereotypical environment. This work would suggest that the design of company environments can prevent non-traditional candidates from being hired, and that encouraging companies to create inclusive, non-stereotypical environments may reduce gender disparities in the technology industry.

Through the design and implementation of a 2-credit focus group course, my project investigates how theory can be used to understand the impacts of body dissatisfaction. Widely recognized in research as a "normative discontent" for women and a growing number of men, body image dissatisfaction impacts individuals and communities on a daily basis. While many programs and organizations work to improve body image, I have found a lack of theory and criticism of current discourses within body-positive campaigns.Because of this, the goal of these focus groups is to inspire activism and change in the way that society views different bodies through a theoretical lens. The discussion-based, peer-facilitated group of 8-12 students discusses bodies in various contexts: feminism, biopolitics, normalization, medicalization, identity, oppression politics, and sociocultural norms. The results of these focus groups included awareness of the issue of body dissatisfaction and individual activism projects that challenge social, cultural, and political norms surrounding bodies.This project demonstrates an effective way of bringing issues of bodies, identity, and oppression to the community sphere to promote understanding and activism.

In the United States, eating disorders affect nearly 10% of the population and have the highest mortality rate of any mental illness. Among at-risk populations, female athletes involved in aesthetic sports, including dance, are the most likely to develop an eating disorder. High incidence and widespread prevalence of eating disorders among dancers is often interpreted as a desire to craft a body required to achieve peak artistic and athletic performance. Previously conducted studies on numerous populations of dancers reveal that body dissatisfaction, heightened sensory awareness, and trained perfectionism are contributing factors to eating disorder development. Despite commonalities between varying explanatory models of illness, the spectrum of theories pertaining to eating disorder etiology does not adequately represent the lived experiences of the primary investigators and insufficiently addresses the relationship between embodied identity and aesthetic sport. This pilot research project seeks to challenge the assumption that eating disorders among dancers manifest to maintain a performance-enhancing physique and aims to identify when and how dance can destabilize the identity of certain dancers. Drawing from data generated through an analysis of autobiographical narratives, this research seeks to generate a new theory to comprehensively explain the high prevalence of eating disorders among dancers. This theory will serve as the grounding framework for an extension of this project in which each primary investigator continues research to develop and answer a more pointed question that bridges gaps in existing literature. 

Women with a history of sexual victimization often have higher rates of alcohol consumption and sexual risk-taking than women with no history of sexual victimization. One explanation proposed for these associations is the self-medication hypothesis which says that women with sexual victimization histories engage in drinking and risky sexual behavior to cope with distress or to increase positive affect. Although popular wisdom and research studies link alcohol and sexual risk-taking, sexual assault victims often experience difficulty with sexual intimacy. Specific motives to consume alcohol in order to cope with or further enhance sexual behaviors have not been examined. Further, it is not known how a history of sexual assault would impact sex-related drinking motives and whether these motives would mediate the association between sexual assault history and both alcohol consumption and risky sexual behavior. We are currently in the process of recruiting undergraduate women through the University of Washington Psychology Department’s Online Subject Participation Pool. Women are asked to complete a forty-five minute online survey about their drinking patterns, history of sexual experiences and sexual assault, and endorsements of sex-related drinking motives. Data collection will be complete at the end of winter quarter, after which we will conduct mediation analyses using bootstrapping to test our hypotheses that sex-related drinking motives will mediate the relationship between a history of sexual victimization and both alcohol consumption and sexual risk-taking. We expect that these motives will partially mediate the relationships between a history of sexual victimization and both alcohol consumption and sexual risk-taking. Results will help inform effective interventions tailored toward survivors of sexual assault.

Recent longitudinal studies show a trend of declining emotional health paired with an increased demand for counseling services among college students. It has been proposed that this population faces difficulties in regulating emotions, especially in the face of challenges that are new and unique to them. In the clinical field, mindfulness practice is gaining evidence as a way to increase individuals' self-awareness, acceptance and present moment attention – qualities that have robust evidence of being beneficial for the effective regulation of emotions. The rationale of this research is that mindfulness practice could potentially increase the capacity for allowing painful emotional experiences and thus reduce maladaptive automatic responses to stressors (i.e. denying or suppressing negative emotions). The main aim of this study is to explore whether Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) mindfulness skills, which are six distinct skills designed to cultivate the different components of mindfulness in everyday life, can be efficacious at reducing difficulties in emotion regulation and increasing mindfulness in a non-clinical population of college students. In addition, since few studies have evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of mindfulness-based interventions in college settings, this study fills in the gap by evaluating feasibility and acceptability using specified, testable criteria, and by exploring an alternative method of instruction: using audio recordings of DBT mindfulness practice. The study design is a between-subjects randomized controlled trial comparing an intervention group which will receive a two-week mindfulness training, with a non-intervention group which will not receive the intervention. The hypotheses of this study are that the intervention will be 1) efficacious at increasing mindfulness, 2) reducing anxiety and 3) decreasing emotion dysregulation, will be 4) acceptable in terms of participant retention and opinion toward the intervention, and 5) feasible in terms of adequate participant recruitment and compliance to the intervention protocol.

Our objective was to further explore the facial feedback hypothesis. This theory, that facial movements (efference) can influence one’s emotional experience, has historically been studied using either positive or negative stimuli. We used neutral stimuli to see if facial efference is affective in influencing emotion in the absence of stimuli that prompt an emotional response. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions created by holding a chopstick – forced smile (chopstick between teeth), forced frown (chopstick between lips), or neutral (chopstick in nondominant hand). Participants were then shown 5 neutral images, each for 6 seconds, via PowerPoint. They then rated the images on 11-point Likert scales, from 0 (extreme sadness) to 10 (extreme happiness), indicating what emotion the image was expressing. Results showed no statistically significant difference between those whose facial expressions were manipulated into smiles and those who had neutral or frowning facial expressions. A deeper understanding of the relationship between facial expressions and emotions could alter the way in which we explore treatments for both mental and physical health conditions.