From 1996 until 2012, the rate of cesarean section in the United States has increased almost 63 percent from 797,119 to 1,296,070, reaching an all-time high of 32.9 percent of births at present. Starting in 2009, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has published guidelines for inducing labor and performing maternal-requested cesarean deliveries. Since 2007 the rate of “home-births” surged, increasing by almost 50 percent to over 35,000 now. Various media such as Ricki Lake’s popular documentary, The Business of Being Born, have questioned the current birthing system in the United States. They call for a return to “traditional” methods of infant delivery, or delivery primarily by midwife. The result is polarization between modern obstetrics and midwifery. Each faction is quick to place blame. This paper refocuses the discussion away from the usual statistical evidence of quantitative recordkeeping and concentrates on the anecdotal and proprietary experiences of ancient medical writers, drawing from often forgotten historical sources. With these in mind, I argue for a more holistic and nuanced approach to determining the correct course of action, bearing in mind the often competing interests of preserving and reducing historically low maternal and infant mortality rates against cultural and traditional concepts and identifiers. To do this I present a brief history of ancient gynecology and obstetrics, offer details into ancient dystocia (difficult labor) and its “remedies” (including embryotomy), and discuss the effect of innovation on dystocia. Finally, I reveal that birth is a far more complicated event than either traditionalists or western medicine recognize or willingly concede, reducing it to either a natural process or a pathological one, respectively.