Augmenting course material to be relevant and accessible to students is a ubiquitous challenge throughout academia. We aimed to design, develop, and evaluate the effectiveness of activities meant to promote the learning of difficult concepts in Anatomy and Physiology. More specifically, we focused on the neurophysiology chapter of an open access Anatomy and Physiology course sponsored by the Carnegie Mellon Open Learning Initiative (OLI). This course is being created for pre-nursing students attending community colleges. We used the six-level schema of Bloom’s Taxonomy, a module addressing the knowledge and development of intellectual skills, to design learning activities that encouraged students to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate concepts rather than simply recall, explain, and define them. By compelling students to work at higher cognitive levels during the learning process, we hypothesized that there would be a corresponding elevation in critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of the material. Our curriculum design strategy was informed by cognitive science research that shows increases in learning efficacy when students are motivated to work at higher cognitive levels. Assessments were designed to align with these higher cognitive level learning activities. Our learning activities were tested by Anatomy and Physiology students using Carnegie Mellon’s OLI course. The Carnegie Mellon course uses an innovative digital dashboard platform which allowed us to track individual student’s understanding of concepts before, during, and after using our materials so that we were able to analyze their success and effectiveness. We revised our learning activities based on these results.